Open Science and scholarly publishing roundup – November 13, 2015
OUP Blog
The future of scholarly publishing
Chronicle of Higher Education
What open-access publishing actually costs
Chronicle of Higher Education
Introducing Open Library of the Humanities
Times Higher Education
Journal impact factors ‘no longer credible’
Research Policy
Editors’ JIF-boosting stratagems – Which are appropriate and which not? [subscription required]
Inside Higher Education
More support for ‘Lingua’ editors
PLOS Blogs
Peer review – tips for junior reviewers
Bloomberg
Academic publishing can’t remain such a great business
The Guardian
European commission unveils its A-team of science advisers
Scientific American
China’s first science Nobel Prize exposes stresses on country’s research
Gizmodo
How computers broke science—and what we can do to fix it
Wired
Behind the scenes at the breakthrough prizes, the glitzy oscars for science
Chronicle of Higher Education
3 Rules of academic blogging
The Telegraph
The junior doctors’ contract threatens research and medical progress
Nature
Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
OUP Blog
“Fordham professors write your books, right?”
@Academics Say blog
Academic assholes and the circle of niceness
The Guardian
Measuring up: how open data could spur drive to meet the global goals
Leave a Reply