Open Science roundup, 17 June 2016

Posted on June 17, 2016 by Frontiers Communications in eBooks // 0 Comments

What’s new in peer review, Open Science and scholarly publishing?

Nature

Muddled meanings hamper efforts to fix reproducibility crisis

Scientific American

Psychology’s credibility crisis: the bad, the good and the ugly

Motherboard

Why can’t scientists reproduce a definition of ‘reproducibility’?

Science Magazine

House panel, agencies oppose boost in basic research tax

PLOS Blogs

Politics in academic publishing: past to present

Nature

Gene editing can drive science to openness

Forbes

Should all academic research be free and what Wikipedia can teach us about publishing

Diverse Education

How to respond to negative peer reviews

BioMed Central Blog

What are the challenges of open peer review?

BioMed Central Blog

Peerage of Science: the inspiration, aims and future developments

The Guardian

Scientists aren’t superheroes – failure is a valid result

Remedial Research and Special Education

Replication research and special education

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Copyright © 2023 Powered by WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: