Where belief in free will is linked to happiness
Researchers show that the phenomenon previously seen in Western populations also occurs in Chinese teenagers, and can cross cultural divides
— By Conn Hastings
Western and Asian cultures tend to have different core beliefs around free will. In a recent study published in Frontiers in Psychology, Jingguang Li, professor at Dali University, and his research team show the link between belief in free will and happiness exists in Chinese teenagers.
They found that 85% of the Chinese teenagers expressed a belief in free will, and that this was positively correlated with happiness.
Free will describes the ability to make independent choices, where the outcome of the choice is not influenced by past events. The existence of free will is the subject of debate among psychologists, neuroscientists and philosophers.
The argument against free will is that each decision we make is completely influenced by our previous life experience, so that given a certain choice this experience will trigger us to respond in a certain way, which is not a free choice.
Different perspectives on free will can color our thinking of concepts such as personal responsibility, guilt, ambition and forward planning.
Interestingly, previous studies with Western participants have shown that people who believe in free will tend to be happier. Li and his team were interested to learn if a belief in free will can affect happiness in Chinese people.
Why would this phenomenon be different in China? Well, psychology research shows that Western and Asian cultures tend to have different core beliefs around free will. Western culture is described as individualist, where people are largely focused on personal achievements rather than group goals and competition is common. However, collectivist cultures, such as those of China and Japan, tend to focus more on group goals, such as those of a work group or family, and there is less focus on personal freedom.
The previous studies linked a belief in free will in people from Western countries with increased happiness, better work performance and academic achievements and less negative behaviors such as cheating. In contrast, giving Western participants material discouraging belief in free will has been associated with a subsequent increase in cheating behavior, aggression and decreased self-control.
To address the matter in their sample of Chinese teenagers, Li and his team gave them each a series of questions about their own belief in free will and their level of happiness. The results imply that believing in free will may be linked to a beneficial effect on happiness, regardless of individualistic or collectivistic cultural influences.
At present, the researchers have identified a correlation between a belief in free will and happiness but they plan to investigate if a belief in free will directly causes happiness in the Chinese population. Future investigations on such causal links will involve assessing behavior after producing a change in a belief in free will.
“We are currently conducting investigations on the potential for causality between these two variables,” says Li. “We plan to change participants’ belief in free will in the laboratory by exposing them to materials that either support or disprove the existence of free will, and then observe whether their happiness levels change,” he explains.
If a causal link can be found, why might believing in free will help someone to be happier? A belief that someone can act freely to achieve their goals and desires may increase levels of perceived autonomy and help facilitate self-control and deliberate effort to achieve goals, leading to successful outcomes. If it can be shown that strengthening a belief in free will can help people to pursue happiness, then psychologists could develop training programs with this in mind.
The article on outcomes resulting from free thoughts and free will addresses a core issue that is globally prevalent. Having born in Baghdad, Iraq and lived in different cultural settings, I was convinced that the most prevalent reason for people to even indicate what ailed them (‘symptoms’ they present with) are often and strongly tinged by a ‘fear of what to say…..and what NOT to mention’. The underlying reasons went beyond controlling spouses or employers, but was a realistic picture of ‘the traumatic effects of stress’ affecting almost all members of the society. People, of any age, would fear to express any foods that they like or any activities that they enjoy.
A notable example occurred in a children’s class room when Saddam Hussein entered and asked a 7 year old: “Do you know who I am?”. “Of course, I do…..you are the one when his picture appears on TV, my father starts throwing anything handy e.g. tomatoes, eggs, etc. to reflect his disgust and anguish in the regime.” Unfortunately, such a statement in murder of the parents AND close relatives of the child.
I don’t know the extent of such barbarism occurring in different dictatorial regimes, but the many examples of this kind result in a strong and feared impediment to express any thought. Thank you.
The episode presented is an example of many other similar ones. Indicating that does NOT insinuate improved personal and social freedoms of subsequent regimes. However, it is very often that peoples’ thought processes, expressed or not, may result in severe and cruel outcomes. The comments made are generic to similar regimes and expressed ‘with malice toward none and charity for all’.