Skin bacteria could save frogs from virus

Ranavirus can wipe out entire common frog populations, but researchers say their latest study could help the species; Frontiers in Microbiology

Frontiers in Microbiology; Ranavirus can wipe out entire common frog populations, but researchers say their latest study could help the species
European common frogs. Credit: Chris Sergeant/ZSL.

Ranavirus can wipe out entire common frog populations, but researchers say their latest study could help the species

— by University of Exeter

Bacteria living on the skin of frogs could save them from a deadly virus, new research suggests.

Ranavirus kills large numbers of European common frogs – the species most often seen in UK ponds – and is one of many threats facing amphibians worldwide.

Scientists from the University of Exeter and ZSL’s Institute of Zoology compared the bacteria living on frogs – known as their “microbiome” – from groups with varying history of ranavirus.

They found that populations with a history of outbreaks had a “distinct” skin microbiome when compared to those where no outbreaks had occurred.


Outbreaks of an Emerging Viral Disease Covary With Differences in the Composition of the Skin Microbiome of a Wild United Kingdom Amphibian
► Read original article
► Download original article (pdf)


“Whether a population of frogs becomes diseased might depend on the species of bacteria living on their skin,” said Dr Lewis Campbell.

“Ranavirus is widespread, but its presence in the environment doesn’t necessarily mean frogs become diseased – there appears to be some other factor that determines this.

“The skin is often the first infection point in ranavirus, and the first stage of the disease can be skin sores.

“It’s possible that the structure of a frog’s microbiome – the mix of bacteria on its skin – can inhibit the growth and spread of the virus so it can’t reach a level that causes disease.

“While the results of our study demonstrate a clear link between the frog skin microbiome and disease, further research will be need to understand the exact mechanisms which cause this relationship to form.”

Laboratory trials will help establish whether a history of ranavirus infection causes the microbiome differences, or whether these are pre-existing differences that predispose some populations to infection.

The scientists tested the skin bacteria of more than 200 wild adult European common frogs (Rana temporaria) from ten populations.

They found that the microbiome of individual frogs is usually most similar to that of others in the same population (those living in the same geographical area), but that populations with the same disease history were more similar to each other than to populations of the opposite disease history.


Related: Young frogs that were stressed as tadpoles move less on land, putting their survival at risk


Even though amphibians can partially “curate” their microbiome by producing proteins that benefit specific bacteria, they are limited to those bacteria which are available in their environment.

Ranavirus can wipe out entire common frog populations and, though the new findings need further investigation, the researchers hope their work could help the species.

Dr Xavier Harrison said: “There’s growing evidence that skin bacteria may protect amphibians from lethal pathogens such as chytrid fungus, and that we can develop cocktails of probiotic bacteria to prevent vulnerable individuals from contracting disease.

“Our work suggests that given enough effort and research, similar probiotic therapies may be effective against ranavirus.”


Original article: Outbreaks of an Emerging Viral Disease Covary With Differences in the Composition of the Skin Microbiome of a Wild United Kingdom Amphibian

REPUBLISHING GUIDELINES: Open access and sharing research is part of Frontiers’ mission. Unless otherwise noted, you can republish articles posted in the Frontiers news blog — as long as you include a link back to the original research. Selling the articles is not allowed.

2 Comments on Skin bacteria could save frogs from virus

  1. Rosa Fasching // September 23, 2019 at 5:33 pm // Reply

    Did these scientists finally understand Prof. Dr. Günther Enderlein and Prof. Dr. Alfred Nissle by using the antagonism of the microbes?

  2. Martin W. Hahn // September 26, 2019 at 12:37 pm // Reply

    This is an interesting and important study, however, some statements are surprising. The paper stated:
    “Three additional SVs enriched on the skin of frogs from disease-free populations were characterized as detector species. These SVs belonged to the genera Nodella, Alpinimonas, and Limnohabitans. These genera are known to occur (…) in fresh water (La Scola et al., 2004) (…), but little else is yet known about their ecology.”
    Actually, the genus Limnohabitans is currently one of the best investigated taxa of freshwater bacteria. Many papers dealing with the ecology of this genus were published (non is listed in the reference list of the paper). Interestingly, bacteria of the genus Limnohabitans are currently considered to either possessing a planktonic lifestyle or living in association with water flea (Daphnia). Some previous publications suggested a large ecological heterogeneity among members of this genus. Only specific Limnohabitans strains or species may be suitable as “detector species”.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: